Monday, April 26, 2010

Sunday, April 18, 2010

Getting Ready to Shoot

So I discussed with my collaborator Matt the idea of pushing our movie shoot until September because we'll have a lot more access to film equipment at that point. So it looks that's what's going to happen.

Although I'm still going to act as though we're shooting this summer, if we shoot in September it really gives me more leeway to storyboard. Right now I have to have a first draft on May 1st. Then Matt and I are going to make both our material coherent and consistent. I imagine I'll do a few subsequent rewrites, and then the real fun begins.

The movie is a straight up crime flick in the style of film noir. I'm going to storyboard using blacks and whites and my brush pen. The goal is not to half ass it. I want to make a storyboard where the artwork can stand on its own merits. Most would say not to go that far for a storyboard because they are not necessarily meant to look pretty. However, I plan on importing the storyboards on to Final Cut Pro, doing a script reading (preferably with the actors we cast), and pacing the audio from the script reading to the storyboard on FCP, making a pre-vis. If the pre-vis is good enough, I'll add that to my director's reel, which currently is pretty skimpy.

Once I have a pre-vis of the movie, actors in mind, etc., I might use the extra time to find additional financing. I figure the pre-vis will be a great tool for that. Second, with my mini-DV cam, I'm really going to push my desire to film one short film a week. Shoot it one day, edit it the second day and then show it to people for their reaction. That's Sam Raimi's advice. There couldn't be a greater way to warm up for a feature film shoot and to continue beefing up my reel by making ten shorts or more. On another note, Matt and I are looking for subjects for a documentary. We're not just going to make one feature, we're going to make two. Our follow-up to the film noir will be a documentary and it will happen before next summer. I'm quite excited by the prospect of that. I'm also excited to continue working with the Seattle film community whom I've met a lot of in the last few months.

Last night, Liz said it was sexy how ambitious I was, but I told her it's only out of fear and desperation. Even though I'm still attending my school, being in Washington makes me feel less active than when I'm in San Francisco and constantly working on something, be it a friend's project or my own. Too many people who want to be filmmakers have no drive. They figure they'll go to film school and when they get out, work will be waiting for them. The way I see it, I have no other option than to just fucking make a film. I don't want to pull cables on someone else's film set, and after the high of co-writing and producing The Penitent Man, I need need need to create some more. The best way to be a creative type is to simply do it using what resources you have. I have enough to continue my journey as a filmmaker, and therefore I have to.



Monday, April 5, 2010

New Poll: What Summer blockbuster are looking forward to most in 2010?

I added a poll thingy to the right of the page underneath the blog archive. I want to know what people are looking forward to seeing the most this summer when it comes to the "big" films.

As an unapologetic M. Night Shyamalan fan, my pick is easily The Last Airbender. That's followed very, very closely by Christopher Nolan's Inception.

THE LAST AIRBENDER





INCEPTION

Friday, April 2, 2010

Turbulent Times: Star Trek, The Outer Limits & the 1960s


I want to write about two major science fiction shows that grew to popularity at two different points in the 1960s—The Outer Limits (1963-1965) and Star Trek (1966-1969). Aside from both being science fiction programs, there seemingly is not much that links the two series in terms of tone and content. Instead, what is striking is how two different shows explored different themes involving everything from sexism and feminism, racism and race relations, and militarism and peace. All of the social commentary was very relevant to the issues in the latter half of the 1960s. Star Trek, in particular, is notable for being set in future yet reflecting contemporary problems, including the Cold War. Gene Roddenberry, Star Trek’s creator, himself said, “I have no belief that Star Trek depicts the actual future. It depicts us, now, things we need to understand about that.” It is worth comparing it to The Outer Limits  because of how tonally different the two were despite both being science fiction shows with a great deal of contemporary subtext.
If I'm going to compare the two shows, I think it's best to use one particular episode as an example. The Outer Limits and Star Trek both have episodes that are an adaptation of a short story titled "Arena" by Fredric Brown. The story is about a man and an alien who are coerced into fighting to the death by a superior, if not omnipotent, alien being. Whoever loses the duel will have their race annihilated by the superior alien. The Star Trek episode shares the name of the short story. The different approaches the respective writers took for both episodes define the differences between the two shows. In The Outer Limits episode, titled “Fun and Games,” good and bad are not clearly defined. Much of this is due to the series’ film noir influences. Many of the characters are shady, with a lot of inner conflict, and could have been straight out of a 1940s film noir. For example, in “Fun and Games,” the main protagonist is an ex-pug named Benson who’s on the run from the law for a crime he witnessed, but did not commit. Like most of the anthology’s protagonists, Benson's humanity is tested in a physical manifestation and external conflict with an alien being.  Having a character like that, and putting him in a position that decides the fate of humankind, significantly raises the stakes in a way that Star Trek was not necessarily able to. At the end of “Fun and Games,” Earth is ultimately saved, but is it truly a note of triumph? The main character goes back to his sad existence and all is as it was before—bleak.
In the Star Trek episode “Arena,” which aired a few years after “Fun and Games,” Captain James T. Kirk is put in the exact same position as Benson. He is summoned to a planet by a vastly superior being to fight another captain of a different species to determine the outcome of their race. Kirk is ever cunning, and his heroism keeps the feeling of imminent danger to a minimum. At the end, Kirk defeats his opponent but refuses to finish him off, thus filling the role of peace-maker. The being that summoned Kirk then appears, as a young, almost angelic figure. It is revealed that Kirk’s mercy was what passed the true test, proving that there is indeed hope for human beings. This is a clear message relating to The Cold War, which was causing escalating paranoia in the wake of the Vietnam War at the time. 
The Outer Limits and Star Trek have great differences, as exemplified by their contrasting handling of the same source material.  Aside from being an anthology show rather than a continual  episodic series, The Outer Limits, unlike both Star Trek and The Twilight Zone, is not at all overt in its social commentary. Its goal, first and foremost, was to entertain. Therefore, the writers focused more on the suspense and sci-fi aspects. The message was conveyed through the edgy nature of its characters, and the decisions they make when put in extreme scenarios. The tone of The Outer Limits was considerably darker, and its messages were often more ironic, as opposed to the sometimes didactic Star Trek. One interesting thing to note is that before Star Trek  was created, Gene Roddenberry was often present at The Outer Limits studio and even recruited some of its writing team for Star Trek.
Star Trek took a very progressive, very optimistic view of the future. Gene Roddenberry was a self-described humanist, who always held out hope for mankind. His vision of the 23rd century was a world in which war, religion, racism and sexism do not exist. Mr. Spock is often used as a figure that is discriminated and treated poorly, particularly by Dr. McCoy, for being a Vulcan. This is because, being an alien, he was a safe target to get the message across without much controversy. In addition, the creators of the show attempted to portray female characters as equals. However, studio executives put pressure on the creators to keep women dressed in skimp clothing and skirts. Nonetheless, the character Lt. Uhura is notable not only because she is a woman in a commanding position, but she is also a black character. The crew of the U.S.S. Enterprise was deliberately mixed race, including a Japanese American character, Hikaru Sulu. Star Trek’s legacy as an innovative show is not solely because of its science fiction ideas, unlike The Outer Limits (the sci-fi content of which has inspired countless rip-offs and adaptations), and more with its social and political commentary, particularly when it comes to race relations. After all, the show was broadcast during the height of the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s. In the episode “Plato’s Stepchildren,” Star Trek made television history by showing the first interracial kiss between Captain Kirk and Lt. Uhura—a decision that was hard to make for the studio executives at NBC.     

Ultimately, Star Trek and The Outer Limits have secured their place in TV history for different reasons. Both are great displays of science fiction which has more to say about the times in which they were broadcast. The Outer Limits typically had contemporary settings with contemporary characters, in which an external science fiction element is introduced. It’s the ordinary meets the extraordinary, which is the basis for a lot of the show’s appeal. It is able to more effortlessly relate to the events of which it took place due to layered characters and modern setting. Star Trek, on the other hand, is set in the future but reflects an idealized version of the human race as envisioned in the 1960s. The two shows are worth comparing because they are both examples of hard science fiction. All true good science fiction, like westerns, are morality plays. They may have outlandish stories and settings, but they’re about us. It allows for subjective viewing—anyone can find themselves in these stories, and that makes them endure.

My New Girlfriend

Yes, I have a new girlfriend. It happened really suddenly. As dorky as it sounds, we met online--yeah, I know. But already it has totally paid off because this is the happiest I've been at the start of a relationship (we've only been dating a little over a week) in a long, long time.

She's quite rad, and I suspect she will appear in my blog in the future.

Oh, and her name is Liz. Learn it well.